Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's body is still a little thinner. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much greater display pixel density, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.