Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than Galaxy A32 5G, it's just a little thinner and newer. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11, providing you lots of additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite larger screen and a way greater pixel count per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way more mega pixels camera and a way better video quality. Galaxy A32 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy A32 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.