Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, with a overall score of 90.7 against 75. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11, so it gives some additional features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little larger screen and a way greater display pixel density. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A32 5G and Galaxy S25 Ultra have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.