Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 77.8 score against 75. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S5 Sport is way older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's design is just a little thinner and noticeably lighter. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy A32 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB and 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A32 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.