Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S7 edge is a lot older than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter.
Galaxy S7 edge has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A32 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.