Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. Galaxy S8's construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy S8 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S8 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a lot better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.