Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A32 5G's score of 75. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S9 is extremely older than Galaxy A32 5G, it's body is notably lighter and just a little thinner. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A32 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.