Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro's design is older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier than Galaxy A32 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way higher pixels amount per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A32 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity. Galaxy A32 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.