Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having an 88.5 score against 75. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little larger screen and a lot greater pixels density.
Galaxy A32 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.