Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having a global score of 92.3 against 75. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, although they were released only 6 months apart. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much better pixels amount per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.