Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 94.6 score against 75. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with all the same OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much heavier but a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a bigger display, a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy A32 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.