Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than Galaxy A32 5G, getting a general score of 90.6 against 75. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide very similar OS features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Galaxy A32 5G were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is notably thinner but heavier than Galaxy A32 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels, a greater pixel density and a bigger display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A32 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Galaxy A32 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.