Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has a score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. Despite of the fact that Xperia XZ Premium is a lot older than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. The Xperia XZ Premium has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a way higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a way better processing power than Galaxy A32 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 5G features just a bit better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a way better 48 MP resolution camera and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A32 5G has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a much longer battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.