Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G, having a overall score of 79 against 75. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11, providing a lot of extra features. Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is older and incredibly thicker than the Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a very superior performance than Galaxy A32 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2160px resolution and a much better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.