Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is much better than the Galaxy A32 5G, having a score of 89 against 75. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 and Galaxy A32 5G were released only 7 months apart, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 construction is somewhat thinner but just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A32 5G. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give very similar operating system features.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a bit larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a higher pixel amount in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A32 5G features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.