Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Ceramic |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 80.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold design is somewhat thinner but incredibly heavier than Galaxy A32 5G, and they were released only a couple months apart.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a bigger screen, a way better 1860 x 2480px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Galaxy A32 5G one, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.