Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Galaxy A32 5G, with a score of 87.9 against 75. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the Galaxy A32 5G were released with only 9 months difference, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is a little bit thinner but also just a little heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a greater pixels amount in each inch of screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much greater performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A32 5G has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.