Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a score of 87.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical OS features. Xiaomi Poco F3's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, although they were released only 2 months apart.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a lot better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a quite larger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both have the same video frame rate, a 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and the same camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.