Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an older 10 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a higher pixel count in each inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega pixels camera. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little better battery duration than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.