Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an overall score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. Even when Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and the Galaxy A32 5G were released with only 8 months difference, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. These phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a brighter display than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a better pixels density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A32 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A32 5G's battery lifetime, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.