Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having an 81.1 score against 75. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is just a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and both of them were released only a couple months apart.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a higher pixels number in each display inch and a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a battery life that's very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A32 5G, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.