Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G, having a overall score of 79 against 75. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an older and a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy A32 5G, but Xiaomi could make it just a little thinner anyway. Both devices we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a little larger display, more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A32 5G features more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery life is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. They have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.