Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 11 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, having a global score of 76 against 75. The ZTE Axon 11 construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released just 10 months before. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 11 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version.
ZTE Axon 11 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a better pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The ZTE Axon 11 features a much better performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G captures better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a way worse 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The ZTE Axon 11 has a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 5G features greater battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.