Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.33 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's score of 82. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor providing a way lower image quality, worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has greater battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.