Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an overall score of 82, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor capturing lot worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a way more MP back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.