Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.14 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 overall score. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS, but LG K92 has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11. The LG K92 body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but it's a lot heavier.
The LG K92 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a camera with a 64 MP and the same aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot better video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality. The LG K92 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.