Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a overall score of 82 against 81.3. Even though Galaxy A32 LTE Only is thicker than LG V35 ThinQ, it's extremely lighter and much newer. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy A32 LTE Only count with similar screens, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller sensor which offers a much lower image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.