Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, getting an 87.1 score against 82. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each inch of display.
The LG Velvet features much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.