Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only, with a global score of 89.6 against 82. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has the older 10 version while Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11 version. The Motorola edge features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a little bit better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola edge counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Motorola edge also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit better battery duration than Motorola edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.