Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, with a 92.8 score against 82. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11 version, so it provides you some nice extra features. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a little higher screen density.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.