Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 82 score against 78.5. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is older and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's design is still much lighter.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a brighter screen and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera with way less mega-pixels, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.