Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, getting a general score of 86.3 against 82. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen and way more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.