Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32 LTE Only's general score of 82. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot brighter screen and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.