Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a thinner and lighter phone than Moto G 5G, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Motorola Moto G 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games than Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only one.
The Moto G 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.