Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.80 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a bit better than the Moto G9 Power, getting an 82 score against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G9 Power, although they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the newer 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features and optimized performance.
Moto G9 Power counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, they have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much higher screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 64 mega-pixels, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has faster 60 fps video frame rates. The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G9 Power has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.