Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is thicker than Moto Z Force, it's way lighter and a lot newer. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has more cpu cores. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Moto Z Force has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.