Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. Even though Galaxy A32 LTE Only is somewhat thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's a lot lighter and a lot newer. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.