Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 82 against 77.4. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only construction is notably newer and lighter, but notably thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lot tinier sensor taking way worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a larger aperture and a back camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.