Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 411 pixels per inch | -- |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s score of 79.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a little smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also counts with a much higher video quality. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.