Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's design is newer and notably lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's, but it's just a bit thicker. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same display brightness, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a much larger sensor and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.