Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, having a 98.9 score against 82. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a little smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.