Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 overall score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit bigger screen, a little higher pixels amount in each display inch and a really brighter display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher video definition, a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy A32 LTE Only have really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.