Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-25 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 global score. The Galaxy S9 design has the same thickness than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but it's incredibly heavier. Galaxy S9 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S9 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, a much smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.