Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's body is newer, a lot lighter and extremely thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better processing power than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.