Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having an 82 score against 76.6. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, giving some additional features. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is newer, way lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy A32 LTE Only one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a worse (Full HD) video quality and a back-facing camera with a much worse 48 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and Galaxy A32 LTE Only count with extremely similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.