Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting an 82 score against 81.1. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is newer, much lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a battery life that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.