Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, having a global score of 98.9 against 77.8. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than Galaxy A33 5G, because it has a quite greater pixels amount per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features a little bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.