Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-22 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G's general score of 77.8. The Galaxy S9 is a way older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
Galaxy S9 has a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A33 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A33 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.