Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-04-22 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Galaxy A33 5G, with an 87.9 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12. Although it's the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A33 5G.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy A33 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A33 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photos or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A33 5G has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.