Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than Galaxy A34, with a score of 85.3 against 82.9. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A34 has Android 13 OS. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a little better performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro Max's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy A34's one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a much lower image quality and a way worse resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Galaxy A34 has better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 26 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.